Leading Theme Park Operator

Case Study — Leading Theme Park Operator

Balancing Express and Standby Queues in Real Time

A leading theme park operator used Safari AI to predict wait times, track ride dispatch and fill rate, and set the express-to-standby merge ratio at its attractions.

Live
Predicted Waits
Per merge
Express vs. Standby
Per ride
Dispatch & Fill

Measured from existing queue and station cameras

Families walking along a theme park midway with a looping roller coaster behind them

A ride attendant at the merge point between a long standby line and a short express line
The Challenge

Express and standby lines were balanced by feel at the merge point.

Where a ride's express and standby queues met, a team member decided how many guests to let through from each. Without live data, express guests waited longer than they paid for, or the standby line stalled while seats went empty.

  • Merge ratios were set by eye, not by measured queue lengths
  • Posted waits were estimated from heuristics and manual counts
  • Fill rate and dispatch gaps only showed up in end-of-day reports
See How Safari AI Solves This
What We Deployed

Wait times, dispatch and merge guidance from one live feed.

STEP 01

Connected to queue and station cameras via an on-premise server

Existing queue and ride station cameras fed a lightweight on-premise server Safari AI deployed in the park, so video was processed on site.

STEP 02

Measured queues, merges and every dispatch

Computer vision counted guests in the standby and express queues, time-stamped every dispatch and measured the fill rate of each one.

STEP 03

Guided the merge point in real time

A traffic-engineering model told merge staff how many guests to admit from each queue, and predicted waits updated for guests across the park.

Merge Control
Park overview · Today · Updated 19:05
LIVE
Standby Wait
38min
↓ 4 min vs target
Express Wait
9min
Target ≤ 15 min
Merge Ratio
4:1
Express : standby
Fill Rate
87%
↑ 2 pts vs target
Express wait (min) · Attraction #1
Within targetOver
TARGET 15 MIN
10:0011:0012:0013:0014:0015:0016:0017:0018:0019:00
AttractionStandbyExpressRatioStatus
Attraction #145m12m4:1On target
Attraction #230m18m3:1Raise ratio
Attraction #320m6m5:1On target
Attraction #455m14m4:1Slow loads

Note: Illustrative data

The Result

Shorter standby lines, and express that stays express.

A standby queue moving steadily through a shaded switchback
Live
Predicted Waits

Predicted waits were updated from measured queue data, so guests choose rides with accurate expectations and staff can spread the crowd.

Guests walking quickly through an express lane beside a busier standby lane
Per merge
Express vs. Standby

Merge staff got a measured ratio for every attraction, so express guests keep the speed they paid for without stalling standby.

A fully loaded roller coaster train leaving the station as the next riders wait
Per ride
Dispatch & Fill

Dispatch timing and fill rate were tracked ride by ride, so empty seats and slow loading get fixed during the peak.

Action Center

Action Center: From Insight to Action.

Measurements like these feed Safari AI's Action Center, which turns a drifting merge ratio or a slow dispatch into a specific staff action.

Measure
Every queue, every merge
→
Alert
Express wait nears its limit
→
Recommend
New merge ratio, per SOP
→
Dispatch
Merge staff notified
→
Outcome
Both lines keep moving
  • Real-time recommendations to improve KPIs via email, SMS, robocall, mobile app, Power BI, or API.
  • Recommendations grounded in your own written SOPs, not generic best practices.
What it means for guests Ratio adjusted → ↓ Express wait → ↑ Throughput → ↓ Standby wait
Get In Touch

See this on your own attractions.

This operator balanced express and standby queues with live measurements from cameras already in its parks. We'll walk through which attractions and merge points are the best fit for a pilot on your cameras.

Queue Wait Time Dispatch Optimization Speed of Service Throughput

Get In Touch

Next
Next

Charlotte Hornets